Here are some education headlines to catch your attention:
Literacy by Third Grade a Renewed Priority for States
by Heather Hollingsworth 02/05/13 03:34 PM ET EST
KANSAS CITY, Mo.—Flunked, retained, held back
Whatever you call it, increasing numbers of states are not promoting students who are struggling to read at the end of third grade.
Thirty-two states have passed legislation designed to improve third-grade literacy, according to the Education Commission of the States. Retention is part of the policies in 14 states, with some offering more leeway than others.
“Passing children up the grade ladder when we know they can’t read is irresponsible—and cruel,” said Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback in announcing in his recent State of the State address that third-graders should demonstrate an ability to read before being promoted. He also proposed a $12 million program for improving third-graders’ reading skills.
Governor Brownback is right. Passing children up a ladder when we know they can’t read is certainly irresponsible—and cruel. But once these children are flunked and retained in the third grade, sentenced to failure grade after grade with a second retention almost certainly guaranteeing they will drop out of school—well, such a consequence should be considered professional malpractice by state legislatures and state and local boards of education. It’s also bad economics.
Instead, here’s what we must do:
- Place the responsibility for children’s being unable to read in the third grade on inadequately funded education budgets at the preschool and early childhood level. That includes funding for parent education and adult literacy.
- Dramatically increase funding for Title I programs—don’t cut it! Wrap-around services for schools in low-income communities are desperately needed for after-school and summer school programs.
- Assign children to attend summer school when they don’t make the grade, as was done decades ago. Doing so could have a meaningful impact on parents and students by assuring proper supplemental support both during the regular school year and in required summer courses.
- Monitor the emphasis on using test numbers alone to judge reading proficiency. These numbers are typically based on proficiency with splinter fluency skills and isolated skills of grammar, spelling, and language arts. But we also need to pay attention to a child’s comprehension, understanding, and delight in the remarkable richness of available children’s literature (both fiction and nonfiction). We face a serious unintended consequence when we use test scores as the only measure of whether a child passes or fails a grade, and when those scores influence a school’s performance score as measured by state and federal authorities. That consequence: Children may be retained as a way of elevating test scores.
Yes, our society as a whole is flunking in its support of public schools, teachers, and the children we educate. Our funding priorities will not make us globally competitive until we actually allocate significantly more money for the education of our students, who ultimately will represent our interests in the world at the local, state, national, and international levels.
Ask Chip a question or share your own thoughts!
—If you’re reading this entry on the blog site,
click “Post a Comment” or the word “Comments” below the entry
—If you’re reading this entry from your email,
click “Yardsticks” to go to the blog site.
Then click “Post a Comment” or the word “Comments”
below the entry.

Categories:
Tags:

As a 27 year veteran teacher of 3rd grade I found these headlines appalling. It is again so frustrating to me when politicians make blanket statements of what children should know and by what age. Have they ever been responsible for a year’s educational growth for a child? Have the politicians ever greeted a child at the door when his father has been taken away from home last night because he was selling drugs out of the family apartment? Have they ever snuck a loaf a bread and a jar of peanut butter in a child’s backpack on a Friday afternoon because it is the end of the month, and she came to school hungry and as a teacher you are so worried about her not eating all weekend? Have they ever looked into the eyes of a child whose parents fight day and night and is afraid if he does not get perfect grades it might cause his dad to leave again, and this time for good? If the world was perfect and a child had two parents at home with stable jobs, and a stable home life, and who sent children to school emotionally ready to learn during the day, and supported learning at home in the evenings and weekends with time and energy, then perhaps blanket benchmarks could be set. Children have to be emotionally available for me to teach. I work hard to build a community in my room, to make them feel accepted, loved and safe, but I can’t follow them home. I can only share them with their parents for that year. These are my students, not employees I can fire if they are not doing their “jobs”. Politicians come for the business world where they deal with adults, not children. I do not have the knowledge or know how to run a business, nor do they have what it takes to run my classroom.