Common Core Standards For Young Children…Beware

National “Common Core,” grade by grade, K–12 educational standards are being rapidly finalized across the political landscape as they pass through the doors of governor’s offices and state houses even before the miniscule window of opportunity for public comment closes. Kentucky has already become the first state to endorse such standards publicly in a special joint legislative session.

Please check out this statement from the Alliance For Childhood released March 2nd and see if you might want to add your name to a growing list of concerned early childhood advocates, educators, and parents. These are people who do not want to see high quality, academically and socially sound kindergarten programs severely compromised in the way the new national standards are proposing.

Joint Statement of Early Childhood Health and Education Professionals on the Common Core Standards Initiative

Issued by the Alliance for Childhood

March 2, 2010

www.allianceforchildhood.org

We have grave concerns about the core standards for young children now being written by the National Governors Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers. The draft standards made public in January conflict with compelling new research in cognitive science, neuroscience, child development, and early childhood education about how young children learn, what they need to learn, and how best to teach them in kindergarten and the early grades.

We have no doubt that promoting language and mathematics is crucial to closing the achievement gap. As written, however, the proposed standards raise the following concerns:

• Such standards will lead to long hours of instruction in literacy and math. Young children learn best in active, hands-on ways and in the context of meaningful real-life experiences. New research shows that didactic instruction of discrete reading and math skills has already pushed play-based learning out of many kindergartens. But the current proposal goes well beyond most existing state standards in requiring, for example, that every kindergartner be able to write “all upper- and lowercase letters” and “read with sufficient accuracy and fluency to support comprehension.”

• They will lead to inappropriate standardized testing. Current state standards for young children have led to the heavy use of standardized tests in kindergarten and the lower grades, despite their unreliability for assessing children under age eight. The proposed core standards will intensify inappropriate testing in place of broader observational assessments that better serve young children’s needs.

• Didactic instruction and testing will crowd out other important areas of learning. Young children’s learning must go beyond literacy and math. They need to learn about families and communities, to take on challenges, and to develop social, emotional, problem-solving, self-regulation, and perspective-taking skills. Overuse of didactic instruction and testing cuts off children’s initiative, curiosity, and imagination, limiting their later engagement in school and the workplace, not to mention responsible citizenship. And it interferes with the growth of healthy bodies and essential sensory and motor skills—all best developed through playful and active hands-on learning.

• There is little evidence that such standards for young children lead to later success. While an introduction to books in early childhood is vital, research on the links between the intensive teaching of discrete reading skills in kindergarten and later success is inconclusive at best. Many of the countries with top-performing high-school students do not begin formal schooling until age six or seven. We must test these ideas more thoroughly before establishing nationwide policies and practices.

We therefore call on the National Governors Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers to suspend their current drafting of standards for children in kindergarten through grade three.

We further call for the creation of a consortium of early childhood researchers, developmental psychologists, pediatricians, cognitive scientists, master teachers, and school leaders to develop comprehensive guidelines for effective early care and teaching that recognize the right of every child to a healthy start in life and a developmentally appropriate education.

Signers

Defne Apul, Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH

Cara Armstrong, Curator of Education, Fallingwater, Mill Run, PA

Ray Bacchetti, Vice President, Planning and Management, Emeritus, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA

Lyda Beardsley, Director, Child Development Programs, College of Marin, Kentfield, CA

Laura M. Bennett-Murphy, Associate Professor, Psychology, Westminster College, Salt Lake City, UT

Karen D. Benson, Professor, California State University, Sacramento, CA

Eugene V. Beresin, M.D., Professor of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Wendy C. Blackwell, Director of Education, National Children’s Museum, Washington, DC

Wil Blechman, M.D., President, Docs for Tots Florida; Past President, Kiwanis International, Miami, FL

Lila Braine, Emeritus Professor of Cognitive Psychology, Barnard College, Columbia University, New York, NY

Michael Brody, M.D., Chair, Media Committee, American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Washington, DC

Stuart L. Brown, M.D., Founder and President, National Institute for Play, Carmel Valley, CA

Blakely Bundy, Executive Director, Winnetka Alliance for Early Childhood, Winnetka, IL

Nancy Carlsson-Paige, Professor of Early Childhood Education, Lesley University, Cambridge, MA

Catherine Carotta, Associate Director, Center for Childhood Deafness, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE

Sherry Cleary, Executive Director, NYC Early Childhood Professional Development Institute, City University of New York, NY

Colleen Cordes , Executive Director, Psychologists for Social Responsibility, Washington, DC

Milly Cowles, Dean, Principals’ Academy, Mobile, AL

Ellen F. Crain, M.D., Professor of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY

William Crain, Professor of Psychology, City College of New York, NY

Sara McCormick Davis, Associate Professor, University of Arkansas Fort Smith; President Elect, National Association of Early Childhood Teacher Educators, Fort Smith, AR

Diane Trister Dodge, President, Teaching Strategies, Inc., Bethesda, MD

Georgianna Duarte, Professor, University of Texas, Brownsville, TX

Barbara Dubitsky, Director, Mathematics Leadership Programs, Bank Street College, New York, NY

Sean Durham, Director, Early Learning Center for Research and Practice, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN

David Elkind, Professor Emeritus of Child Development, Tufts University, Medford, MA

Ann S. Epstein, Senior Director of Curriculum Development, HighScope Educational Research Foundation, Ypsilanti, MI

Beverly Falk, Professor, School of Education, City College of New York, NY

Stephanie Feeney, Professor Emerita of Education, University of Hawaii; Chair of the Advocacy

Committee, National Association of Early Childhood Teacher Educators, Honolulu, HI

Margery B. Franklin, Professor Emerita of Psychology, Sarah Lawrence College, Bronxville, NY

Doris Fromberg, Professor and Director of Early Childhood Teacher Education, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY

Joe L. Frost, Parker Centennial Professor Emeritus, University of Texas, Austin, TX

Ellen Galinsky, author and work life researcher, New York, NY

Suzanne Gellens, Executive Director, Florida Association for the Education of Young Children, Tampa, FL

Roberta Golinkoff, H. Rodney Sharp Professor of Education, Psychology, and Linguistics and Cognitive

Science, University of Delaware , Newark, DE

Elizabeth N. Goodenough, Lecturer in Literature, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Rachel Grob, Director, Child Development Institute, Sarah Lawrence College, Bronxville, NY

Marcy Guddemi, Executive Director, Gesell Institute of Human Development, New Haven, CT

Darell Hammond, CEO and co-founder, KaBOOM!, Washington, DC

Jane M. Healy, educational psychologist and author, Vail, CO

Kathy Hirsh-Pasek, Stanley and Debra Lefkowitz Professor of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA

Craig Holdrege, biologist, educator; Director, The Nature Institute, Ghent, NY

Carla M. Horwitz, Lecturer, Yale Child Study Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT

Carollee Howes, Professor, University of California, Los Angeles, CA

Kim Hughes, Therapeutic Teacher, Trainer, and Consultant; 1999-2000 North Carolina Teacher of the Year, Project Enlightenment, Wake County Schools, Raleigh, NC

Olga S. Jarrett, Associate Professor, Early Childhood Education, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA

Candace Jaruszewicz, Director, N. E. Miles Early Childhood Development Center, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC

Jim Johnson, Professor-in-Charge of Early Childhood Education, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA

Constance Kamii, Professor, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL

Lilian G. Katz, Professor Emeritus and Co-director, Clearinghouse on Early Education and Parenting, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL

Ethan H. Kisch, M.D., Child Psychiatrist; Medical Director, Quality Behavioral Health, Warwick, RI

Robert H. Klein, Professor Emeritus of Physics, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH

Tovah Klein, Director, Center for Toddler Development, Barnard College, Columbia University, New York, NY

Edgar Klugman, Professor Emeritus, Wheelock College, Boston, MA

Alfie Kohn, author and lecturer, Belmont, MA

Linda Kroll, Professor, School of Education, Mills College, Oakland, CA

Linda Lantieri, Director, The Inner Resilience Program, New York, NY

Diane E. Levin, Professor of Early Childhood Education, Wheelock College, Boston, MA

Yeou-Cheng Ma, M.D., Developmental Pediatrician, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY

Fran P. Mainella, Co-Chair, U.S. Play Coalition, Clemson University, Clemson, SC

David Marshak, Professor Emeritus, Seattle University, Seattle, WA

Milbrey McLaughlin, David Jacks Professor of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA

Gillian D. McNamee, Professor and Director, Teacher Education, Erikson Institute, Chicago, IL

Deborah W. Meier, Educator and Senior Scholar, New York University, New York, NY

Mary Sue Miller, Lead Educator for Early Learning, Chicago Children’s Museum, Chicago, IL

Lowell Monke, Associate Professor of Education, Wittenberg University, Springfield, OH

Mary Ruth Moore, Professor, University of the Incarnate Word, San Antonio, TX

Dorine Morese, Instructional Coordinator, NYC Office of Early Childhood Education, New York, NY

John Nimmo, Executive Director, Child Study and Development Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH

Nel Noddings, Lee Jacks Professor Education Emerita, Stanford University, Stanford, CA

Pedro A. Noguera, Peter L. Agnew Professor of Education and Executive Director, Metropolitan Center for Urban Education, New York University, New York, NY

Susan Ohanian, Fellow, Education Policy Studies Laboratory, Arizona State University, Charlotte, VT

Sharna Olfman, Professor of Clinical and Developmental Psychology, Point Park University, Pittsburgh, PA

Linda Olivenbaum, Director, California Early Childhood Mentor Program, San Francisco, CA

David Osher, Vice President, Education, Human Development, Workforce, American Institutes for Research, Washington, DC

Vivian Gussin Paley, author and teacher emerita, University of Chicago Laboratory Schools, Chicago, IL

Kim John Payne, director, Center for Social Sustainability, Antioch University, Northampton, MA

Helene Pniewski, M.D., Developmental Pediatrician and Child Psychiatrist, Providence, RI

Ruth Prescott, Professional Development Director, Chicago Metro Association for the Education of  Young Children, Chicago, IL

Baji Rankin, Executive Director, New Mexico Association for the Education of Young Children, Albuquerque, NM

Fretta Reitzes, Director, Goldman Center for Youth and Family, 92nd Street Y, New York, NY

Mary S. Rivkin, Associate Professor, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD

Alvin Rosenfeld, M.D., Child Psychiatrist; Lecturer, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

A. G. Rud, Head, Department of Educational Studies, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN

Eliza Russell, Director of Education, National Wildlife Federation, Reston, VA

Susan Riemer Sacks, Professor of Psychology, Barnard College, Columbia University, New York, NY

Lawrence J. Schweinhart, President, HighScope Educational Research Foundation, Ypsilanti, MI

Dorothy G. Singer, Senior Research Scientist, Dept. of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT

Jerome L. Singer, Professor Emeritus of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT

Mary Stone, President, Missouri Association for the Education of Young Children, Springfield, MO

Maurice Sykes, Executive Director, Early Childhood Leadership Institute, University of the District of Columbia, Washington, DC

Molly Thompson, Director, Early Childhood Programs, Breakwater School, Portland, ME

Arlene Uss, Director, Center for Early Care and Education, Bank Street College, New York, NY

Rosario Villasana-Ruiz, Faculty, City College of San Francisco, CA

Macy Welsh, Director, National Lekotek Center, Chicago, IL

Donald Wertlieb, Professor, Eliot-Pearson Department of Child Development, Tufts University, Medford, MA

Frank R. Wilson, M.D., Neurologist (retired), Stanford University School of Medicine, Portland, OR

Marie Winn, Writer, New York, NY

Lisa Witkowski, Director, Future Workforce Unit, Workforce Solutions for Tarrant County, Fort Worth, TX

Chip Wood, Author and educator, Courage and Renewal Northeast, Wellesley, MA

George Wood, Principal, Federal Hocking Middle & High School, Amesville, OH

Note: Signers’ affiliations are listed for identification purposes only and do not signify the organizations’ endorsement of this statement. For a full list of signers, see www.allianceforchildhood.org. For more information about this statement and the Alliance, contact Executive Director Joan Almon (joan.almon@verizon.net) or Senior Researcher Edward Miller (ed@allianceforchildhood.org).

JOIN THE CONVERSATION!


Ask Chip a question or share your own thoughts!

—If you’re reading this entry on the blog site,
click “Post a Comment” or the word “Comments” below the entry

—If you’re reading this entry from your email,
click “Yardsticks” to go to the blog site.
Then click “Post a Comment” or the word “Comments”
below the entry.

How Much There Is to Learn

In the preface to my book Yardsticks: Children in the Classroom, Ages 4-14, I ask readers  to “pay attention to the linits of developmental characteristics and characterizations.” I note that although general expectations about childrens’ behavior have emerged through detailed and repeated observations and have yielded certain patterns of development, “they are not precise predictions of what will happen at a given age.”

In 1993, writing in Childhood: A Multicultural View (out of print, but check your library, used bookstore, or online sources), Melvin Konner had this to say:

We have to be patient; we are finding out new things just as fast as we know how. And if anyone gives you the impression that he has all the answers now to the great timeless questions about childhood, you can smile and listen politely or you can turn your back and walk away, but in any case don’t believe him.

I was so strongly reminded of Konner’s caution recently when reading that the erudite American Psychiatric Association just decided that childhood bipolar disorder, which had shown such dramatic diagnostic increases (from roughly 20,000 in 1994 to 800,000 in 2003, according to the National Center of Health Statistics), was being considered for reclassification in the new DSM – V (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders). Seems now that psychiatric researchers are discovering that it may be extremely rare for bipolar disorder to occur in children and adolescents and continue into adulthood, but that it can happen.

However, a new category of disorder is being proposed. TDD, or temper dysregulation disorder, may actually be what is afflicting hundreds of thousands of children, most of them boys, previously diagnosed as bipolar. The diagnostic descriptors for this disorder are many and serious and clearly suggest therapeutic and medical interventions of their own. To gain a deeper insight into this shifting territory, you may want to read the comprehensive article on the Child Psychology Research Blog by Nestor Lopez-Duran, Ph.D.

JOIN THE CONVERSATION!


Ask Chip a question or share your own thoughts!

—If you’re reading this entry on the blog site,
click “Post a Comment” or the word “Comments” below the entry

—If you’re reading this entry from your email,
click “Yardsticks” to go to the blog site.
Then click “Post a Comment” or the word “Comments”
below the entry.

Circles of Power and Respect

Being a parent or teacher of pre-teens and young adolescents is an amazing experience. There is no question that “tweeners” between the ages of 11 and 14 need extra-strong support, nurturing, and guidance during a time they are demanding increased independence, exhibiting mercurial emotions, and sending mixed messages about how they feel about thenselves and the most important adults in their lives.Yet these kids reveal boundless positive energy, creative ideas, and a strong sense of idealism and desire to learn when in the company of adults who understand how to provide safe, challenging, and relevant learning experiences for them.

If you’re looking for ways to further improve your middle school and to sustain a positive and productive culture of real respect, productivity, and achievement, I suggest you check out an approach to integrated social and academic learning for adolescents called Developmental Designs®. Founded by educator and author Linda Crawford, this program provides transformational professional development for teachers, principals, and entire school communities. From this collaborative learning emerge middle school classrooms that are deeply meaningful to students and that engage them in rigorous and significant learning. Just imagine joining a middle school homeroom with students gathered each morning in a “Circle of Power and Respect,” engaged in rich dialogue, listening to each other’s ideas, homework struggles, and writings, occupied in meaningful activities right at the beginning of the school day.

Classroom Discipline: Guiding Adolescents to Responsible Independence is Crawford’s latest text supporting this approach. Written with co-author and middle school educator Christopher Hagedorn, Classroom Discipline is destined to become a constant companion for middle school educators looking for real and practical strategies for everyday life in the classroom. Written boldly, with no quick fixes, Classroom Discipline provides over 250 packed pages of straightforward lessons and strategies. The real voices of teachers and students punctuate every chapter and let you know you are not on your journey with adolescents alone.

The Advisory Book, Linda Crawford’s 2008 guide to establishing and sustaining successful middle school advisory programs, is also an exceptional resource and fully explains the “Circle of Power and Respect” approach. For further information about these books and Developmental Designs®, visit the Origins website or call 800-543-8715.

JOIN THE CONVERSATION!


Ask Chip a question or share your own thoughts!

—If you’re reading this entry on the blog site,
click “Post a Comment” or the word “Comments” below the entry

—If you’re reading this entry from your email,
click “Yardsticks” to go to the blog site.
Then click “Post a Comment” or the word “Comments”
below the entry.

The Soul of Education

A short time ago, we lost one of the clearest and most courageous voices in the field of education. Rachael Kessler, author of  The Soul of Education: Helping Students Find Connection, Compassion, and Character at School and a leader in the field of social and emotional learning, passed away at the end of January.

Rachael knew the needs of adolescents as few others do and gave voice to those needs in her writings and in the creation of PassageWorks, which carries on her work. She leaves a legacy of wisdom and insight and grounded applications for middle and high school teachers and leaders—and for all of us. Her ideas speak as precisely to the needs of adolescents today as they did ten years ago when The Soul of Education was first published. Her “Seven Gateways to the Soul in Education,” detailed in her book, provide a stunning articulation of the hopes of the human heart.

In the last paragraph of The Soul of Education, Rachael writes, “Perhaps most important, as teachers, we can honor our students’ search for what they believe gives meaning and integrity to their lives, and how they can connect to what is most precious to them.”

It is the meaning of this italicized “they” that Rachael championed. We honor her by continuing to listen and pay attention to future generations in the ways she taught us.

JOIN THE CONVERSATION!


Ask Chip a question or share your own thoughts!

—If you’re reading this entry on the blog site,
click “Post a Comment” or the word “Comments” below the entry

—If you’re reading this entry from your email,
click “Yardsticks” to go to the blog site.
Then click “Post a Comment” or the word “Comments”
below the entry.

Parents, How Can You Best Reinforce Your Child’s Strengths?

In my entries about children’s positive attributes, you can find details about the kinds of strengths children seem to display at different ages and stages of their development. No two children are the same, of course, and each will gravitate to different interests at the same ages because different things excite different children, energize them, engage and enlighten them. and make them feel strong. Noticing and asking about these interests helps children feel validated in their choice making.

Some children persevere with interests because the more they stay engaged with them the stronger they feel. Other children move often from interest to interest until they settle on something they recognize as making them feel strong.

A remarkable author has helped me to understand that a child’s strengths are not the same thing as their abilities or skillfulness in a particular area. Jennifer Fox has written a powerful book titled How to Discover and Develop Your Child’s Strengths: A Guide for Parents and Teachers The first two sections of the book build an understanding of how our educational system and parenting penchants and inclinations tend to focus on a deficit model of thinking and learning. We can become consumed with what our children do not know and cannot do. We then try to fill what we perceive as a void with extra tutoring help, specialized athletic camps and coaching, extracurricular activities and counseling. Fox calls this way of looking at children “The Weakness Habit.”

“…whether your approach to life is positive will have a great effect on your children’s ability to put the strengths they discover to work in the real world,” says Fox. She writes, “Remember, strengths are not talents or skills, or what your children are good at. All those things are open to evaluation and criticism. Strengths are far more personal—they are the activities that make someone feel strong.” This she calls “A Strength Awakening.”

The last section of the book is an actual workbook in which you can do specific activities as a way of exploring strengths with your child. An extensive appendix also looks at Fox’s own work as an educator and explores a strength-based approach she developed known as “The Affinities Program.” She’s implemented this program at the Purcell School in Pottersville, New Jersey, since 2003.

This book is both challenging and affirming. It will make you question a lot of your parenting assumptions and practices and give you lots of ideas for communicating with and supporting your child.

JOIN THE CONVERSATION!


Ask Chip a question or share your own thoughts!

—If you’re reading this entry on the blog site,
click “Post a Comment” or the word “Comments” below the entry

—If you’re reading this entry from your email,
click “Yardsticks” to go to the blog site.
Then click “Post a Comment” or the word “Comments”
below the entry.

New Look–and Another Look at Positive Attributes

Thanks to all the wonderful people at Responsive Classroom, you’re now seeing a new-year, new-decade look for my blog, Yardsticks4-14.com. You’ll find that it’s now easier to post and find comments from other readers on any topic of interest related to child development, parenting, teaching, school, and educational issues. It’s also now easier to be in touch with me directly if you have particular questions to which you’d like a private answer.

Parents, I hope, will be pleased with—and will take frequent advantage of—the new “Just for Parents” page. I’ll sometimes post specific entries of particular interest to parents on that page, but it’s also a place for you to speak out—to pose your observations and questions about your child’s growth and development and about home, school, peer, and sibling issues.

Entering the new year and decade, I’d like to link you back to a series of entries I posted last year about the “Positive Attributes” of children. More and more, I think we gain strength as parents and teachers by being able to see and appropriately appreciate our children’s and students’ strengths and the interesting ways they learn from daily adventures and challenges.

As I wrote in the post to introduce the “Positive Attributes” series:

As parents and teachers, we are keenly interested in knowing and understanding everything we can about our children as they grow and mature. We cannot help but wonder if certain behaviors are typical or normal at the age or grade in school our children are currently navigating. Often we may find ourselves most attentive to what we may perceive as negative or inappropriate behavior or possible deficits we suspect in learning abilities or personality and social or emotional development.

As we compare our children (or students) to others in their same age range it is natural for us to create a kind of mental ranking about where one child falls in our understanding of what is appropriate at a certain age or grade. Is she behind or ahead academically? Too shy or too bossy? Is he “keeping up” with his peers socially? This normal way of observing and measuring sometimes keeps us from seeing more of the strengths children are exhibiting and developing and from appreciating all the positive aspects of the social and cognitive learning challenges that they face.

If you didn’t have a chance to read these posts last year, if you’re a new visitor to Yardsticks4-14, or if you just want a boost from reading about the great things you can expect to see in your child or the children in your classroom this year, you can read these posts right now under “Positive Attributes”  in the “Categories” list on the right side of this page. You can also look for the new “Growing Strong” series in the Responsive Classroom newsletter. Starting February 2010, each issue will feature the positive attributes of children at a different age.

Welcome or welcome back!  Chip

JOIN THE CONVERSATION!


Ask Chip a question or share your own thoughts!

—If you’re reading this entry on the blog site,
click “Post a Comment” or the word “Comments” below the entry

—If you’re reading this entry from your email,
click “Yardsticks” to go to the blog site.
Then click “Post a Comment” or the word “Comments”
below the entry.

Welcome to My Newly Redesigned Blog!

I hope you’ll like the new look, and I also hope you’ll enjoy these new features:

  • A page where parents can ask questions about their child’s development
  • A place to post general comments and questions

If you’d like to subscribe so that you’ll get an email message each time I post, it’s easy. Just go to the top upper right corner of the page, type your email address, and click “Subscribe.”

If you were already subscribed, and you’d like to continue your subscription, you need to resubscribe. Again, just go to the top right corner of this page, type your email address, and click “Subscribe.”

I’m looking forward to continuing to share good conversation with all of you!

JOIN THE CONVERSATION!


Ask Chip a question or share your own thoughts!

—If you’re reading this entry on the blog site,
click “Post a Comment” or the word “Comments” below the entry

—If you’re reading this entry from your email,
click “Yardsticks” to go to the blog site.
Then click “Post a Comment” or the word “Comments”
below the entry.

Voices in the Wilderness

If you work in the field of education, you may share the same troubling mental image I have as we enter the new decade and ponder the future of our children.

I see the beginning of a national marathon with teachers, administrators and state education officials all crowded at the starting line. There’s a giant banner over our heads. “RACE TO THE TOP,” it says. There are cash prizes to the winners of this race. The Secretary of Education has the starter gun in his hand. The President will make an appearance at the finish line in a large high school gymnasium filled with adoring students, parents, and teachers.

Many politicians and national educational experts think this is the race we must run to be the best educational system in the world. Governors, college presidents, educational researchers, economists are all in the grandstands, cheering. Some will even pass out water bottles and serve at check points along the marathon route. But those of us who continue to teach every day, or lead a school or school system, will be the ones who will actually run this race…along with our students, actually. It’s not a fair contest, particularly for those students, schools and districts that start the race at a distinct disadvantage.

Way back in 1964, civil rights leader Whitney Young, writing of the “discrimination gap” in his book To Be Equal (out of print; try your library or used book dealer), used a similar foot race analogy to state the obvious:

The situation is much like that of two men running the mile in a track meet. One is well-equipped, wears track shoes and runs on cinders. The other is barefoot and runs in sand. Seeing that one runner is out-distancing the other with ease, you then put track shoes on the second fellow and place him on the cinder track also. Seconds later it should surprise no one to see that the second runner is still yards behind and will never catch up unless something else is done to even the contest.

An achievement gap is certainly real in education. But under-resourced public schools cannnot close this gap for their students by being given a new pair of track shoes and then being asked to catch up. “Something else” must be done. Young called for a “domestic “Marshall Plan” in the sixties that was partially realized in President Johnson’s “Great Society” legislation. A similar moral and financial resolve is needed (at the level approaching that used to bail out the banking industry) if we are serious about equal educational opportunity for our neediest students. Focusing on our country being behind in a perceived global competition by raising standards, testing students more often, and closing failing schools is not the way to close our domestic achievement gap.

As “Race to the Top” draws near, I urge you to take the time to listen to a prophetic voice urging the President, the Secretary of Education, and all national policy makers to think carefully about the unintended consequences of running this race. Yong Zhao is a distinguished professor of education at Michigan State University and author of Catching Up or Leading the Way: American Education in the Age of Globalization. If you can’t get to the book right away, read Zhao’s recent interview with Kappan.

JOIN THE CONVERSATION!


Ask Chip a question or share your own thoughts!

—If you’re reading this entry on the blog site,
click “Post a Comment” or the word “Comments” below the entry

—If you’re reading this entry from your email,
click “Yardsticks” to go to the blog site.
Then click “Post a Comment” or the word “Comments”
below the entry.

Hunters and Gatherers

A recent article in our local paper referenced a study from Brunel University in West London, England, released in 2005, that studied the shopping behaviors of men and women in some 14 different countries. It appears that what we may have all observed or experienced during this holiday shopping season does, in fact, mirror the ancient roles of male hunters and female gatherers. Women like to take their time, searching the choices carefully, looking for bargains and taking in all the nuances of the environment as they gather up the best deals. Men, on the other hand, spend as little time as possible on their shopping hunt. They’re on a mission. They move in swiftly for what is usually a single purchase, then get out of the store as quickly as possible.

This got me to thinking about my observations of our two grandchildren, Isaiah, the ten year old “hunter” and Lily, the five year old “gatherer.” It seems to me there is something to certain genetic predispositions being carried by gender, despite our clear intentions as parents and grandparents to “level the gender playing field.”

Before he was five, Isaiah knew how to make gun sound effects, use a stick as a sword or pistol, and talk like a pirate. Lily has happily focused on collections of fairies, baskets of flowers, household odds-and-ends, first writings of shopping lists and menus, and gathering friends, real and imaginary.

Even in the holiday shopping department, the trends do seem to begin early. Lily was delighted to construct her presents, gathered from her craft supplies…a bag for her Nana with her glue-down glitter, hand-lettered name splashed across it; a T-shirt with similar design elements for her other grandmother with her name on the front and angel wings ironed on the back—a good afternoon’s project with her mom. For Isaiah, one-stop shopping in the local farm store, with quick (and thoughtful) selections for all his family members, except for the grandfather who took him on his “hunting expedition.” (Isaiah is currently fascinated by knives and quickly picked out one that he was sure his dad would like…Isaiah liked it a lot.)

How our children and grandchildren will carry their roles into their futures remains to be seen. My hope is that some of the stereotypical roles will give way and melt together to make stronger leaders and followers in distant tomorrows.

JOIN THE CONVERSATION!


Ask Chip a question or share your own thoughts!

—If you’re reading this entry on the blog site,
click “Post a Comment” or the word “Comments” below the entry

—If you’re reading this entry from your email,
click “Yardsticks” to go to the blog site.
Then click “Post a Comment” or the word “Comments”
below the entry.

“Over the River and Through the Woods”

Holiday traditions are developing some new wrinkles as the wrinkles of the generation that carried the torch for their forbearers become more evident with age.

Case in point—a colleague who is the principal in one of the district’s elementary schools where I now serve as curriculum director related this tale to me. She happened to be in a third grade classroom recently where the language arts activity was to work with a partner to talk and think about what you would need to take on a long road trip, say if you were going to a grandparent’s house a ways away for the holidays—“over the river and through the woods,” perhaps. She sat down with a boy and a girl who were beginning their conversation and asked them what they do when they are in the car for a long time. The boy replied that he played with his electronic, handheld game device (the digitalized name of the gadget escaped the principal).

The principal casually mentioned to the kids that when her family went on a long road trip when she was a girl they would all sing in the car. She said the look from both children was one of stunned incredulity. When asked what she did on long trips, the girl replied that she just turned on a DVD she could watch from the back seat. The principal said in her family they would play games like counting license plates to see how many states they could find or play “I Spy with My Little Eye” out the window. Same incredulous looks of disconnect.

I notice the same “keep yourself entertained” (usually with electronics) on the part of my grandchildren as well. “Are we there yet?” is predictably asked only at the end of a game or show when we happen to be in the van on a long trip. Noticing the scenery might occur if I shouted, “Look, a bear!” (which can occur in our part of the country).

On short trips we often don’t allow electronics so we can play “I Spy” and other car games, so perhaps they will choose to pass on these quaint traditions some day to their own children. (They secretly seem to love these games, though they complain about not having their digital delights.)

Perhaps you’ve noticed too, how much children have conversations about virtual reality rather than real life. Because they spend so much time in these pursuits, their conversations focus on telling each other with great enthusiasm about how many whatevers they have bombed into obliteration on level such-and-such in a game with some war-related objective. Note how quickly you tune out of this conversation because you have no common experience, but the kids can easily follow the shared story line and carry on for some time, especially if they don’t have the game with them.

As kids get older, of course, they now graduate to texting and tweeting and other forms of instant messaging. What this all portends is hard to say. The older generation, myself included, bemoans the loss of time-honored traditions, forms of communication and conversation and reflection that seem deeper and more meaningful. But then I remember my parents thinking the world was in serious trouble when television and the Beetles emerged on the scene.

One thing for sure. In America, significant relationships and family ties are more fragile and disrupted than ever before in our history. Those of us who work in schools experience the impact of this every day. Traditions are golden threads that help weave a stronger fabric of connections for children as they grow and as families change. They are worth holding onto and passing on both in our families and in our special school traditions as well.

JOIN THE CONVERSATION!


Ask Chip a question or share your own thoughts!

—If you’re reading this entry on the blog site,
click “Post a Comment” or the word “Comments” below the entry

—If you’re reading this entry from your email,
click “Yardsticks” to go to the blog site.
Then click “Post a Comment” or the word “Comments”
below the entry.